Our Mission:   To create the community that will stabilize the chaos of the Wild West of Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency Technology.   

© 2014 - 2016 CRYPSA and Manuel Perez,

  • Wix Facebook page
  • Twitter Classic
  • Home

  • Standards

  • About Us

  • Blog

  • More

    My Way or What?

    March 24, 2016

    Reglamentación de las Cryptomonedas

    August 4, 2015

    Common Sense Controversy

    July 12, 2015

    CryptoBlok - Keep your BTC Safe Product Dev. Crowdfunding campaign

    June 19, 2015

    How to report coins?

    May 14, 2015

    Why be a part of CRYPSA?

    May 8, 2015

    State of US Regulations on Cryptocurrency

    April 9, 2015

    Stellar & Ripple: Pretenders to Bitcoin throne?

    February 11, 2015

    Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency and CRYPSA

    January 15, 2015

    The Standards Satoshi built into Bitcoin

    December 31, 2014

    Please reload

    Recent Posts

    Common Sense Controversy is a series of short, to the point video clips that deal with concepts, best practices, mistakes and standards within the Bit...

    Common Sense Controversy

    July 12, 2015

    The CRYPSA Dream

    November 1, 2014

    My Way or What?

    March 24, 2016

    1/4
    Please reload

    Featured Posts

    Stellar & Ripple: Pretenders to Bitcoin throne?

    February 11, 2015

    Stellar & Ripple: Pretenders to Bitcoin throne?

    Posted on February 10, 2015 by Ellery Davies

     

    You might know that I am a board member and co-chairperson of CRYPSA, the Cryptocurrency Standards Association. (I write this Blog under a pen name). The organization is brand neutral. That is, we don’t endorse or favor one particular coin over another. Think of CRYPSA standards as the security paper onto which money is printed. The paper can be used for Dollars, Yen and Zlotties. If it prevents counterfeiting then any currency can benefit. Like security paper, the standards we create and the safe practices we promote apply equally to all cryptocurrencies.

    But, as with any user network, recognition, adoption and gravitas count! It’s no secret that Bitcoin is the elephant in the room. It is by far the biggest, baddest and most reported new age coin by any yardstick.

     

    Dollars & cents? Ripple Labs unit = XRP

    But Bitcoin has a problem—at least that’s what fifty start up companies want us to believe. The code that validates transactions (also used to mine coins) is transaction bound and hampered by original design. Moreover, alt coin entrepreneurs make a persuasive case for new features that more fully exploit the block chain potential.

    Wild Ducks may know of Litecoin, Feathercoin, Dogecoin and Mastercoin, but there are even newer coins attracting the eyes of the crypto and investment community. If you have your ear to the ground, the smart money seems to be betting on digital currency coined by Stellar and by Ripple Labs. The rival companies share an eclectic and storied founder and they are both headquartered in San Francisco.

    The New York Observer offers an illustrated history and analysis of the two pretenders in the novel-like style of Wired Magazine. They call it The Race to Replace Bitcoin.

    Wow! In my humble opinion, this is a great article! I will assume that you have perused it. Very little recap here—just a Wild Duck commentary and analysis…

    Ripple and Stellar co-founder Jed McCaleb has a history. He founded eDonkey, a Napster-like service of the early p2p era and Mt. Gox, the big Bitcoin exchange that collapsed in a spectacular and still-mysterious failure. Another co-founder, Sam Yagan also survived eDonkey and OK Cupid. He is now CEO of dating behemoth, Match.com.

    I know some of the other players, but hadn’t realized that Ripple Labs was making waves (pun intended). McCaleb’s newer venture, Stellar, claims to represent more than just a coin. It is a monetary ecosystem that inter-operates across currencies and boundaries. (Isn’t that what Bitcoin does? It seems that I have a lot to learn)…

    I have less programming expertise than these geniuses, and possible less cryptography expertise. But I can outdistance their collective chops on macro economics.

    Wild Duck Analysis

    It is exceedingly unlikely that any venture will create the next cryptocurrency by design, unless the new coin is directly tied to and sanctioned by a believable and uncontested legacy of Bitcoin prime. In effect, a new coin must be a fork of the original code or at least a proper heir with blood lines and public trust.

    Ripple Labs and Stellar have a very bright team. I don’t doubt the need to improve on the Bitcoin protocol, perhaps even with a wholly new technical approach. But the string of failures in McCaleb’s background, the mystery surrounding the first 1.5 billion STRs, and the daffy distribution scheme with Facebook are almost deal killers. This needn’t be an epitaph. There is a path to righteousness…

    Cryptocurrency is already hard for the public to understand and harder to accept. For this reason, an heir to Bitcoin needs five things to succeed:

    • Direct ties to the ownership of all original BTC

    • Sanctioned by top Bitcoin developers AND blessed by Satoshi in a signed email

    • The coin must be ZERO growth. It must never fall prey to inflationary economics. It accommodates a growing base and users and transactions by slicing the pie thinner (or ‘mining’ from a capped pool)—never by creating coins out of thin air.

    • Source code that is transparent, open and without proprietary interests.

    • A unshakeable commitment to continued decentralization and p2p operation with no mandatory reporting of anything (identities, or anything about transaction beyond date, pseudo-anonymous wallet ID and amount). In short, there must be no authority and no requisite bookkeeping beyond the open and distributed block chain.

    There you have it: Our unofficial CRYPSA manifesto of what it takes to dethrone Bitcoin. In short, a successful replacement must be no less than Bitcoin 2. It elevates Bitcoin to the status of emeritus, because it respects the equity of early adopters (and without watering down with ‘newly created shares’)—and it must provably disavow any potential for inflation or manipulation.

     

    Ellery Davies is a founder and board member of CRYPSA. He is also chief editor at AWildDuck.com.

    Please reload

    Follow Us

    Bitcoin

    CRYPSA

    Common Sense

    Community

    Conflict

    Controversy

    Cryptocurrency

    Division

    Finanzas

    Lavado

    Legal

    Prevencion

    Reglamentacion

    Satoshi Nakamoto

    Standards

    text

    video

    Please reload

    Search By Tags

    March 2016 (1)

    August 2015 (1)

    July 2015 (1)

    June 2015 (1)

    May 2015 (2)

    April 2015 (1)

    February 2015 (1)

    January 2015 (1)

    December 2014 (1)

    November 2014 (1)

    Please reload

    Archive
    • Facebook Basic Square
    • Twitter Basic Square